The interview is the widest-varying part of the whole system
ATAR weightings range from 0% to 100% and UCAT weightings from 0% to a third. The interview spans the entire range and does so more often — it is the single biggest reason two applicants with identical results get opposite outcomes at two universities.
| Interview weight | Where |
|---|---|
| 100% | Newcastle / New England Joint Medical Program (Multiple Skills Assessment); University of Sydney, above the 99.95 gate |
| 75% | Western Sydney, Charles Sturt (MMI 75% + UCAT 25%) |
| 70% | La Trobe rural provisional entry (MMI 70% + ATAR 30%) |
| 50% | UQ, USQ, CQU, UWA, James Cook, Charles Darwin (Menzies) |
| 40% | Curtin, Adelaide, Griffith dentistry |
| ⅓ | Monash, UNSW |
| Hurdle only | Melbourne medicine and dentistry — the MMI is pass/fail, not scored into a rank |
| None | Griffith, Sunshine Coast, UTAS, Flinders, Charles Darwin–Flinders; La Trobe, UQ and James Cook dentistry |
The eight with no interview at all
Griffith University — provisional entry to the MD
ATAR 100%, with the UCAT used only to split applicants inside an ATAR band. No interview. Around 20 places a year and an ATAR threshold that has sat in the 99.80–99.90 region. Applicants without a UCAT are still considered but rank last inside their band.
University of the Sunshine Coast — provisional entry
Same structure: ATAR 100%, UCAT as tiebreaker, no interview, hurdle of 95. Regionally focused and materially less competitive than Griffith — one of the few pathways where a strong ATAR alone is genuinely enough.
University of Tasmania — B Medical Science / MD
ATAR 100%, UCAT tiebreaker, hurdle of 95, no interview. Tasmanian applicants sit in a distinctly easier pool; interstate non-rural applicants have historically needed something very close to 99.95. Apply direct to UTAS rather than through a tertiary admissions centre.
Flinders University — B Clinical Sciences / MD
Entry score is ATAR 90% + UCAT 10%. No interview, so the result is effectively decided the day ATARs come out, and MD progression runs on a GPA hurdle with no GAMSAT and no second selection round.
Charles Darwin + Flinders — the NT pathway
The Flinders formula (ATAR 90% + UCAT 10%) run through an NT pathway to the same MD, and materially less competitive than the Adelaide-based entry. NT residency and rural background carry real weight. Interstate applicants face one of the largest penalties on the list.
Three in dentistry
- La Trobe — Bachelor of Dental Surgery, ATAR 100%, no UCAT and no interview. The simplest selection process in Australian dentistry.
- UQ — Bachelor of Dental Science (Hons), ATAR 99 threshold then the full UCAT, including Situational Judgement, as tiebreaker.
- James Cook — Bachelor of Dental Surgery: no UCAT and no interview, but a scored written application plus references. Treat it as an interview you write down rather than as an absence of one.
Getting the interview is a separate contest
At every university that does interview, there are two gates, and the first one removes most of the field. Invitation rules differ from the final formula more often than not:
- Invite on UCAT alone: Western Sydney, Charles Sturt, Adelaide, UWA, Griffith dentistry. A near-perfect ATAR does not buy an interview here.
- Invite on UCAT plus ATAR: UNSW, UQ, USQ, CQU, Curtin. Monash runs a December round on UCAT alone and a January round on UCAT plus ATAR.
- No invitation contest: the ATAR-ranked schools above, plus Sydney and Melbourne where the academic gate is the filter.
Note the consequence for Newcastle's Joint Medical Program: the UCAT is the only thing that gets you into the room, and once you are in it, nothing you did before counts at all.
Interview formats are not interchangeable
| Format | Used by | What it rewards |
|---|---|---|
| MMI — a circuit of short timed stations, each with its own assessor and scenario | Monash, UQ, UWA, Curtin, Adelaide, Western Sydney, Charles Sturt, La Trobe, Melbourne, Griffith dentistry | Recovery. A bad station is one score among many, so consistency beats brilliance. |
| MSA — 8 stations of 8 minutes, plus a Personal Qualities Assessment | Newcastle / New England | The same, with the highest stakes on the list — it is 100% of the offer. |
| Panel — one longer interview with several assessors | Sydney, UNSW, James Cook | Sustained reasoning and a coherent account of why this pathway, not a set of rehearsed answers. |
| Written / other | JCU dentistry (scored application); Curtin (CASPer, 35% of the interview offer) | Preparation done weeks earlier. Curtin's CASPer in particular is not something to leave late. |
Work out which system suits you
The useful question is not "which university is best" but "which selection formula rewards the profile I actually have". Our free medicine and dentistry entry odds calculator answers it directly: put in your UCAT and predicted ATAR and it scores you against all 29 school-leaver pathways using each one's own weightings, home-state adjustments and rural rules — and for every pathway with an interview, it tells you the interview score you would need given your existing results. Sometimes that number comes back as "top 10% of interviewees", which is a useful thing to know in September rather than in January.
Published vs estimated
Weightings, hurdles and interview formats above are published selection criteria. The score thresholds at which offers or interview invitations historically run out are published by no university — those are calibrated estimates and they shift each year with the field. Check current criteria on the university's own admissions page before you preference.
Whichever list you build, the ATAR is on it
All 29 pathways have an ATAR hurdle, and the eight above are entirely or almost entirely decided by it. The interview can be rehearsed in the months before it happens; the ATAR is being decided right now, mostly by whether you keep dropping the same marks in the same places.
That is a tracking problem more than a revision problem — see why revised content still disappears under exam conditions and how to get the marks out of a past paper. errorboard automates the tedious half: photograph your working and it reads the page, names the mistake, and files it by topic, so you can see your top four error patterns instead of trying to remember them.